Blog Series
Categories
Our Campaigns & Initiatives
Announcements
Archive
- May, 2012 (27)
- April, 2012 (62)
- March, 2012 (64)
- February, 2012 (53)
- January, 2012 (53)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
Africa Has Its Say On Darfur Elections
People from all over Africa called in to the BBC’s “Africa Have Your Say” on Wednesday to weigh in on how the Darfur conflict will affect April elections in Sudan.
The questions posed by the BBC prompted listeners to consider how the conflict in Darfur factors into Sudan’s upcoming election, but the conversation veered toward whether the current environment in Darfur would allow for truly representative elections. One point was certain: The respondents almost uniformly believed that the people of Darfuris would not be given a proper opportunity to voice their opinions come voting day, mentioning intimidation by the ruling party, not being registered, election fraud, or other issues among the hindrances. One young man called in to say, “All of these politicians, they never use the right democracy. They never give us a chance to do what we need…we need new ideas, we need new concepts, we need to live as human beings, not as animals.” Here were some of the other memorable comments made by callers:
“Darfurians don’t have faith in the government…some way the election will be manipulated.” - Alicia, Kenya
“In order for Sudan to be at peace all Sudanese need to be able to register.” - Mohammed, Guinea
“The problem of course is who is going to ask these important questions without fear for their lives.” - Text message from Kenya
“If there were freedoms in Darfur, then yes, maybe the elections would help.” - Rob, South Africa
The consensus of the conversation was clear: While many callers see the April elections as a necessary step in the Sudanese peace process, they do not believe that the people of Darfur will benefit from the process. A few went so far as to say that elections would never bring about positive changes in Darfur so long as the country is run by the only sitting head of state wanted by the ICC, and while Darfuris continue to face insecurity and violence.
The show, which also featured commentary from Sudanese Deputy Ambassador to the U.K. Mohammed Zarough, rebel spokesman Ahmed Idris, Umma Party Secretary Miriam al-Mahdi, and Tom Potis of Human Rights Watch, was certainly insightful and warrants listening to in full. After listening to the full hour, key takeaways were that many callers are not optimistic about the outcome of the April elections and believe that peace in Darfur—which will certainly be an issue in the elections—is vital to achieving lasting peace in Sudan.
Photo: Creative Commons









It's sad to think that people in Darfur don't have a total freedom in choosing their leaders. Politicians themselves never use the right democracy. Election fraud is still very rampant thus residents are always filled with fear in expressing their sentiments. I hope peace will reign soon..
Regards,
Tom Kent
Millionaire Mind Intensive Web Developer
I would like to say that you have to continue writing this type of articles...thanks
kerala tour packages |
kerala honeymoon packages |
munnar honeymoon package |
munnar tour packages |
nment in Darfur would allow for truly representative elections. One point was certain: The respondents almost uniformly believed that the people of Darfuris would not be given a proper opportunity to voice their opinions come voting day, mentioning intimidation by the ruling pa
laptop battery factory
laptop battery supplier.
As vote counting begins in Sudan's week-long general elections, analysts are giving the dire assessment that there will
be no winners, and only losers in the process.
Sudan experts at a panel discussion at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace this week in Washington were unanimous in their harsh criticism.
They said what they viewed as a botched election could mark the beginning of the end for all political parties in Sudan, instead of the country's first successful multi-party vote in 24 years.
Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Africa Herman Cohen said northern opposition parties made a huge mistake in boycotting the process. "Do not boycott because rigging, (the) rigging, will be seen. If you boycott, they do not have to rig, so it is important to participate and make sure that the rigging is documented and therefore making the winner even much less legitimate," he said.
Promotional Products Promotional Products Corporate Gifts