Blog Series
Categories
Our Campaigns & Initiatives
Announcements
Archive
- May, 2012 (27)
- April, 2012 (62)
- March, 2012 (64)
- February, 2012 (53)
- January, 2012 (53)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
The Challenge of Finding Durable Solutions for Darfur’s Displaced

While the peace negotiations in Doha between Darfur’s various rebel groups and the Sudanese government initially offered some promise, the people of Darfur – and particularly the region’s estimated 2.7 million internally displaced people, or IDPs – will need far more substantive negotiations to take place before they are able to return to their homes in peace.
Issues of security, land occupation, and access to services continue to hamper the willingness of IDPs to return to their homes. Among the Darfuri IDP population, there are some who have opted to return to areas of continued insecurity in order to plant and harvest their crops, but most have chosen to remain in camps and with host communities that do not have the resources to support them for such an extended period of time. The humanitarian community, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, promotes the idea of “durable solutions” to displacement, or the “voluntary and dignified return, relocation or local integration of IDPs,” but solutions that are truly durable and dignified can be hard to find.
A solution being put forth by the Sudanese government is to construct “model villages.” The government’s Darfur Reconstruction and Development Fund initially proposed the concept as a way of providing housing and basic services to approximately 1.5 million people. According to the government proposal, the model villages would be constructed in the same locations as villages that had been burned down – largely by government-backed forces – during the conflict.
One such village is called Habila Kanare, which is currently being built with the help of the Arab League and opened despite the village’s shortcomings. Habila Kanare was designed to include 400 housing units, and will offer a hospital, education facilities, and pumps with clean water.
While the people of Darfur are accustomed to living small clusters of huts called tukuls, Habila Kanare and other model villages consist of large, brick housing compounds that hold one family in each unit. The goal behind building such villages is to encourage those who resettle in them to join in Darfur’s rapid urbanization, despite their semi-nomadic lifestyle prior to the conflict.
As a Voice of America report phrased it, these new villages are meant to “lure people out of the refugee camps.” But people familiar with Darfur’s unique displacement issues are concerned that the concept may raise more issues than it resolves. As Enough Policy Analyst Laura Jones points out, “[The Sudanese government] is likely building on land that doesn’t belong to it without the approval of the actual owners, who are probably living in displacement elsewhere.” The co-opting by the national government of land that typically belongs to Darfur’s displaced does not offer much hope in the way of longer-term sustainability.
Further, the model village concept does not address many of the security concerns that are preventing IDPs from returning. As VOA mentioned, the opening ceremony Habila Kanare highlighted some of the fundamental challenges of resettlement in Darfur:
“The uneasiness is palpable, with farmwomen, targeted by militias for rape and killing performing for the Arab League delegation, not far from their former tormentors.”
The insecurity felt by the residents of these areas, as well as the continuing pressure on, and competition for, land and renewable resources suggests that those who move to these areas are unlikely to stay. As projects such as Habila Kanare demonstrate, durable solutions for Darfur’s widespread displacement problem have to be identified in close partnership with the beneficiary communities and take into account their primary concerns.
“We are moving these IDPs from warehousing in the displaced camps to urban setting that will forever change their culture and way of living and destroy their social fabric,” said Enough Policy Advisor Omer Ismail. “Meanwhile, the land they left behind will be occupied by newcomers, further changing the demography of the region, fulfilling one of the goals of the genocidaires in Khartoum.”









This is clearly a very facetious article to something that's good for Darfuris.
Give the villages a chance to stand up before you rush to condemn.
It appears that the Sudanese government is damned if it does (help develop Darfur) and damned if it doesn't (develop Darfur).
Keep them in “tukuls”??? Why so they can be ogled by Westerners who like to see an ‘authentic’, though undeveloped, Africa??? Key point: the people of Darfur have ambitions to "move on up" just like everybody else in this world; put simply, the villages are a MASSIVE improvement on their pre-war homesteads before the conflict.
Sounds like the prospect of IDPs returning back to their home areas worries many activists.
Let the hate go; Enough!
It serves no purpose.
Ibrahim Adam
El Fasher
North Darfur
Sudan
Resettling IDPs on land that doesn't belong to them only exacerbates the current conflict in Darfur. When I lived with IDPs in Kenya for a brief period of time I learned that much of the conflict there was a result of land ownership issues, i.e. lack of official land titles, tribal disputes over land. Reoccurring conflict in Kenya has resulted in the continual displacement of various tribes who are relocated by the Kenyan government to lands which belong to another tribe-leading to near endless conflict.
The Sudanese government should seek to end the conflict by negotiating in good faith with Darfuri rebel groups, immediately ceasing its attacks on civilians, and properly negotiating repatriation issues with IDP's from both the civil war and the genocide.
Cameron: Stop building intellectual scaffolds on false claims, which you casually assume as "truths".
Who said the land on which IDPs have been/are being resettled on doesn't belong to the state or that it doesn't have the right to build on that land for good purpose?
You mean you're just prepared to take Enough! at its word based on a conversation between one of its reserachers and a handful of IDPs??? (who are likely to have been deliberately screened by IDP cadres of the Darfuri rebel groups).
I'm certainly not.
Have you heard of any land-titles counter claims being filed in courts in Darfur where these model villages are being built???
No.
Enough! said
I Adam
El Fasher
North Darfur
Sudan
Cameron: Stop building intellectual scaffolds on false claims, which you casually assume as "truths".
Who said the land on which IDPs have been/are being resettled on doesn't belong to the state or that it doesn't have the right to build on that land for good purpose?
You mean you're just prepared to take Enough! at its word based on a conversation between one of its reserachers and a handful of IDPs??? (who are likely to have been deliberately screened by IDP cadres of the Darfuri rebel groups).
I'm certainly not.
Have you heard of any land-titles counter claims being filed in courts in Darfur where these model villages are being built???
No.
Enough! said
I Adam
El Fasher
North Darfur
Sudan