Gration’s Briefing: More Newsworthy Than He Hoped

I would imagine the goal of today’s press briefing by Special Envoy
Scott Gration was simple: give a general, although bland, progress
report on the state of talks and set the table for the conference on
CPA implementation taking place here in Washington on June 23.
Unfortunately, the special envoy strayed off the mark in several comments, and those missteps will likely dominate the news cycle up until the conference. When asked if the situation in Darfur currently amounted to genocide, he parsed his answer to indicate that “What we see is the remnants of genocide.” In a follow up question, he cited “terrorist activities on these folks,” (presumably citizens), by “bandits, Janjaweed and warlords.” Reporters will have a field day with this given that both President Obama and Ambassador Rice have used language within the last two weeks suggesting that they view the genocide in Darfur as ongoing, and this will add fuel to the fire for those suggesting that there is a split in the administration with regard to how conciliatory it should be toward President Bashir – despite the fact that he is wanted for war crimes.
The second linguistic thicket into which Gration wandered was the expulsion of humanitarian aid groups. Gration noted that we have “three new aid groups returning to Sudan” – something of an oxymoron. Are they new aid groups, or are they returning aid groups? As has always been clear, Khartoum was willing to let three of the 13 groups return to work if they were rehatted under new names, a charade the international community apparently was willing to accept. Now Khartoum is expecting credit for its willingness to partially address a humanitarian crisis which it manufactured itself. Gration also insisted that aid capacity in Darfur was back up to nearly 100 percent of what it had been before Khartoum put so many lives at risk through its callous decision to expel aid groups. Lots of analysts, including the humanitarian chief at the U.N., have suggested that we are still well short of restoring previous aid capacity, and most aid groups still face a maze of restrictions that allow Khartoum to turn aid on and off at will.
On the bright side, Gration continued to emphasize the importance of addressing the situation in Sudan comprehensively and not simply bouncing back and forth between focusing on Darfur and the increasingly perilous situation in the South. But on balance, the communications people in the administration look to be doing some serious damage control over the next 48 hours.
Photo: President Obama and Sudan Special Envoy Scott Gration AP/Evan Vucci
Technorati Tags: 
Gration briefing: More Newsworthy than he hoped
It is clear that both John Norris & Laura Heaton are not satisfied with what the Special Envoy has come out with.
By the way, even his words "remnants of genocide" Is not true. If genocide is only five years old, how is it possible that only remnants are observed?
I want to know what is it that these two people really want to do in this country!
Regarding the spilt in the administration as Norris say; we have to know that by different ideas and views it is likely that the truth will come out, why are those two people afraid of the spilt which is considered obvious because what is happening there is explained by personal points of view and most of them have very little or poor credibility.
Speaking about aid groups should be specific, the Sudan Government has taken action against some organizations in name and it has its own good reasons.
Try to give peace a chance; the Sudan Government isn't so bad. You have to show that you are supporting all parties to come to an agreement. Your way in handling the conflict shows is that you are holding one party as absolutely right and the other is the opposite. I wonder how you expect this issue to be resolved under such unbalanced handling?