Categories
Conflict Areas
Blog Series
Our Campaigns & Initiatives
Announcements
Archive
- February, 2012 (18)
- January, 2012 (53)
- December, 2011 (55)
- November, 2011 (69)
- October, 2011 (51)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
Two Years to Self Destruct in Sudan
This post originally appeared on Foreign Policy's The Argument.
Imagine if we had enjoyed the luxury of knowing, two years before it happened, that Yugoslavia would disintegrate in 1991. Or just think if U.S. diplomats had been able to predict years earlier exactly when the Soviet Union was going to collapse. One certainly hopes the United States would have been better positioned to deal with these momentous events. But a current case gives one pause. Sudan might very well split in half in precisely two years, and policymakers have taken far too little notice.
In 2011, Sudan is scheduled to hold a referendum that will allow South Sudan to vote on severing its ties with the North and declaring independence. Almost every observer has concluded that if this referendum happens, the South will vote overwhelmingly for independence, sundering in half the largest country in Africa (that's why the road ahead could not be clearer). But it's the actions taken now, by the Barack Obama administration, that may well determine if Sudan's breakup occurs peacefully or is steeped in blood and a return to full-blown civil war.
The early signs are discouraging. There has been a sharp uptick in violent clashes in South Sudan of the same sort that have already killed hundreds this year. So dramatic is the escalation that the United Nations recently noted that the violence there is now worse than that in Darfur. There have been abundant allegations that the Sudanese government, headed by President Omar Hassan al-Bashir (who is still wanted on outstanding war crimes charges by the International Criminal Court), has been rapidly rearming proxy militias in the South to do Khartoum's bidding. The use of proxy militias has long been a favorite tactic of the ruling party -- both in Darfur and South Sudan. Officials from the South accuse Khartoum of distributing "thousands" of AK-47s in recent months. The U.N. special rapporteur for human rights in Sudan has also noted the presence of more modern and powerful weaponry in recent clashes than has traditionally been the case.
To read the rest of the post, click here.









Peace? Will never happen as long as we have first coward president did nothing to solve this crises now we have a ....... in the white House.. So you got the bottom line
!! ............ God have mercy I know you will not post it.I don't care but You are on the wrong track people .. You are so very ignorant about the real problems around the world , typical.
I just finished reading Eric Reeves' August 26 paper, "Khartoum's Strategic Assault on Southern Self-Determination Referendum" (http://www.sudanreeves.org/Article248.html). A very interesting read that discusses many of the same issues described above.
He also stipulates that a referendum may not actually happen or the Government of Southern Sudan, may actually make a unilateral declaration of independence if Khartoum's National Islamic Front/National Congress Party government continues to arm LRA rebels and other proxy militia in the south to destabalize it and portray the Southern SPLM govenrment as unable to govern. It seems Al-Bashir's government is busy manipulating upcoming elections and possibly preventing a referendum from taking place.
It is generally believed that if the South has a self-determination referendum, the people will decide to for independence. the question remains, is the NIF/NCP willing to let go of precious oil concessions that are located in the south without a fight? Evidence suggests that they are not.
I think it is important to note that if the South becomes more unstable and if war begins again in the South, Darfur will also be brought into the conflict